1 |
Michael Vetter wrote: |
2 |
> Am 09/01/15 um 03:37 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
>> Jc García wrote: |
4 |
>>>> 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com>: |
5 |
>>>>>> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 will |
6 |
>>>>>> be unmasked? |
7 |
>>>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang |
9 |
>>>> around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand |
10 |
>>>> information, |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their |
13 |
>>>> free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work. |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 |
16 |
>>>> [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>> On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least |
20 |
>> workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is |
21 |
>> to early yet. |
22 |
> I have encountered several Gentooers in #gentoo-qt and #gentoo-kde that |
23 |
> use it already. It seems to work, thought not perfectly. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Some Ubuntu-using friends of mine use Qt5 on a daily basis without |
26 |
> problems, I wondered: what's different in Gentoo? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> cheers |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Could be compiler differences, USE flags etc. I may give it a shot. |
33 |
Just see what it looks like if nothing else. I just didn't want to step |
34 |
into water that was way over my head. ;-) |
35 |
|
36 |
Dale |
37 |
|
38 |
:-) :-) |