Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] unmasking qt5 and plasma 5
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:18:18
Message-Id: 54AF8EC1.5030801@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] unmasking qt5 and plasma 5 by Michael Vetter
1 Michael Vetter wrote:
2 > Am 09/01/15 um 03:37 schrieb Dale:
3 >> Jc García wrote:
4 >>>> 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com>:
5 >>>>>> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 will
6 >>>>>> be unmasked?
7 >>>>>>
8 >>>> Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang
9 >>>> around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand
10 >>>> information,
11 >>>>
12 >>>> It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their
13 >>>> free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work.
14 >>>>
15 >>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132
16 >>>> [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt
17 >>>>
18 >>>>
19 >> On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least
20 >> workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is
21 >> to early yet.
22 > I have encountered several Gentooers in #gentoo-qt and #gentoo-kde that
23 > use it already. It seems to work, thought not perfectly.
24 >
25 > Some Ubuntu-using friends of mine use Qt5 on a daily basis without
26 > problems, I wondered: what's different in Gentoo?
27 >
28 > cheers
29 >
30
31
32 Could be compiler differences, USE flags etc. I may give it a shot.
33 Just see what it looks like if nothing else. I just didn't want to step
34 into water that was way over my head. ;-)
35
36 Dale
37
38 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] unmasking qt5 and plasma 5 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com>