1 |
Thanks for you reply Mark. |
2 |
|
3 |
The way you put it makes sense. I guess the option is whether I would like |
4 |
to have the security risk of having my passwords open without needing any |
5 |
kind of authentication. But that depends on whether I can bypass needing to |
6 |
enter a password on autologin in the first please, or if it's not possible. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On 18 December 2012 10:17, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Stephen Griffiths <steve@××××××××××.com> |
12 |
> wrote: |
13 |
> > Is there some kind of rule where if you AutoLogin, you require some kind |
14 |
> of |
15 |
> > authentication when it comes to unlocking the keyring? |
16 |
> That's how the keyring works, in principle. The keyring is a |
17 |
> password-protected secret, and a typical desktop system would be setup |
18 |
> so that the login password you used was also used to unlock the |
19 |
> keyring. With autologin, no password is typed in, so gnome-keyring has |
20 |
> no way of being unlocked without asking you for a password. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> This email is: [ ] actionable [x] fyi [ ] social |
24 |
> Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
25 |
> Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Kind Regards, |
32 |
Stephen Griffiths |
33 |
|
34 |
<http://www.stevegriff.com/>[image: Email |
35 |
steve@××××××××××.com]<steve@××××××××××.com>[image: |
36 |
Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/#!/stevegriffdtcom>[image: |
37 |
Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/SteveGriffDotCom>[image: |
38 |
Google+] <https://plus.google.com/108932032303032698029/posts>[image: |
39 |
LinkedIn] <http://uk.linkedin.com/in/stevegriffdotcom> |