1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
5 |
> On Friday 07 July 2006 21:22, Rafael Fernández López wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> Second thing that I'd improve is a security one. I know that "emerge" |
8 |
>> is a very cared package, but it is a script. Suppose that someone |
9 |
>> commits portage with a emerge failure in its code (he forgot a comma |
10 |
>> !!)... if someone updates portage won't be able to update it again |
11 |
>> because it will fail ever and ever again... So I suggest to have a |
12 |
>> backuped emerge script that we are sure that worked (like the last |
13 |
>> emerge tool that was used), and if the new emerge tool is mistaken (so |
14 |
>> that user doesn't need to know python) only has to run "regenemerge" for |
15 |
>> example, and will have the latest emerge working tool. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> once upon a time, there was a portage-rescue.... |
18 |
> |
19 |
> seems, that it is gone (why?) but you can still find it here: |
20 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~carpaski/portage_rescue/ |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Look inside $PORTDIR/sys-apps/portage/files/README.RESCUE and you'll see this: |
24 |
|
25 |
Please see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml |
26 |
for a recovery guide for a broken portage installation. |
27 |
|
28 |
Zac |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
|
32 |
iD8DBQFErxcY/ejvha5XGaMRAi8xAJ92qQJwuahjZ3IQzVJdoZ9fh8QZvACcCsDc |
33 |
ml2Uz4PQWYGAOClpZVhDajg= |
34 |
=s4iZ |
35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |