| 1 |
On 8/26/05, John Jolet <john@×××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 2:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:20:11 -0500, John Jolet wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> okay, I was wondering how to get the other kernel versions. it's |
| 9 |
> >> emerge gentoo-sources (space) 2.6.11 is it? |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > emerge -av "<gentoo-sources-2.6.12" |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > will get you the latest version prior to 2.6.11, which is a 2.6.9 |
| 15 |
> > revision for gentoo-sources. 2.6.11 is still in vanilla sources. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > emerge -av "<vanilla-sources-2.6.12" |
| 18 |
> Thanks guys. One last question...what's the drawback to using the |
| 19 |
> vanilla sources? I'm assuming gentoo-sources were patched from them |
| 20 |
> for a reason. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
There is much here I don't understand. Isn't it possible for someone |
| 23 |
who actually |
| 24 |
got one of the missing ebuilds to re-build an ebuild and pass it |
| 25 |
around? For instance, |
| 26 |
I seem to have |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
linux-2.6.11-gentoo-r11 |
| 29 |
linux-2.6.11.11 |
| 30 |
linux-2.6.12-gentoo-r4 |
| 31 |
linux-2.6.12-gentoo-r6 |
| 32 |
linux-2.6.12-gentoo-r9 |
| 33 |
linux-2.6.7-gentoo-r11 |
| 34 |
linux-2.6.7-win4lin-r2 |
| 35 |
linux-2.6.7-win4lin-r5 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
of which I seem to be actually running (according to uname) |
| 38 |
2.6.12-gentoo-r6-kosmanor #1 SMP |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Isn't it possible to package one of these and share it? (Provided anyone |
| 41 |
would trust me not to be malicious). |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
++ kevin |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives