1 |
On January 3, 2019 12:29:34 AM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
4 |
>> On 02/01/2019 22:45, Dale wrote: |
5 |
>>> I changed some USE flags. I figure that is one thing that would make |
6 |
>>> Firefox different from say the average user who just downloads Firefox |
7 |
>>> from the website. |
8 |
>> Is there a reason you don't want to try the firefox-bin package I |
9 |
>> meantion in my previous post? |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> That will be if I can't get a source build to work. Thing is, I won't |
16 |
> be surprised if it does the same thing. I suspect this is a bug related |
17 |
> to some permission issue or something related to it within Firefox |
18 |
> itself. I've wondered if I should allow Firefox to store the files in |
19 |
> its own download directory and then move them after it is completed. I |
20 |
> may try that as well. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Long term tho, I do prefer building from source. It's sort of why I |
23 |
> like Gentoo. ;-) It's on the list of options tho. It would eliminate |
24 |
> any local build configs too. It is a good idea to at least test it. I |
25 |
> may try that next. If it still does it, it isn't me for sure. It's |
26 |
> Firefox itself. |
27 |
I agree it's a good idea to try the bin. Also perhaps to try to to back to |
28 |
as vanilla USE flags as possible. IIRC, my only deviances from the default |
29 |
USE flags are to disable pulseaudio and enable clang (though that was only |
30 |
recently after the announcement about how it was supposed to improve |
31 |
performance so much, and was to become the mozilla-preferred method). |
32 |
|
33 |
Fortunately, at least Firefox builds relatively quickly, unlike chromium |
34 |
(~40 min vs ~2.5h on my machine). |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Dale |
37 |
> |
38 |
> :-) :-) |
39 |
> |