| 1 |
Jarry writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 21-Sep-11 21:55, Doug Hunley wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience |
| 6 |
>>> with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I use it as my main fs here and have had no issues. Having said that, |
| 9 |
>> there is NO functional fsck at this time. And abrupt power issues tend |
| 10 |
>> to /hose/ the fs. So, if you have good backups and can restore the |
| 11 |
>> occasional fs, it's fine ;) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Really no fsck? I've heard fedora was going to use btrfs |
| 14 |
> as main filesystem in upcomming release 16 (to be released |
| 15 |
> in about a month). How could they do it without fsck? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think they won't, the German Wikipedia page says they will make it |
| 18 |
default in Fedora 17. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Some weeks ago, it was stated that the fsk will be ready in some weeks: |
| 21 |
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@×××××××××××.org/msg11836.html |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Btrfs is very interesting, but no matter how good it is, I will |
| 24 |
definitely wait until a fsck utility is ready and tested before starting |
| 25 |
to use it. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Wonko |
Archives