Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow...
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:53:51
Message-Id: ff2ad023-a933-6c62-ef6b-dfb02db548a3@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Ubuntu with Gentoo somehow... by tuxic@posteo.de
1 tuxic@××××××.de wrote:
2 > On 03/26 09:22, R0b0t1 wrote:
3 >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >>>>
6 >>>> On Sunday, March 25, 2018, <tuxic@××××××.de> wrote:
7 >>>>> Hi,
8 >>>>>
9 >>>>> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the
10 >>>>> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the
11 >>>>> apt-get and apt-install commands?
12 >>>>> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program
13 >>>>> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?)
14 >>>>>
15 >>>> I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now?
16 >>>> I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions
17 >>>> match the .deb's.
18 >>>>
19 >>> This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely
20 >>> clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered.
21 >>>
22 >>> The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo,
23 >>> so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions."
24 >>>
25 >>> If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use
26 >>> with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on
27 >>> an Ubuntu list/forum/etc.
28 >>>
29 >>> If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with
30 >>> Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it
31 >>> would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the
32 >>> end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are
33 >>> we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating
34 >>> ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a
35 >>> .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo?
36 >>>
37 >>> I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the
38 >>> question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the
39 >>> answer they're looking for, which is fine.
40 >>>
41 >> Well, yes - I think the question as asked has been answered, but I'm
42 >> trying to figure out what he was doing. I did assume he was going to
43 >> be using the packages with Gentoo somehow, just based on the mailing
44 >> list he used.
45 >>
46 >
47 > Hi,
48 >
49 > sorry for my horrific bad English. I will try to explain, what I
50 > intended to do, again. Hopefully this time with more success:
51 >
52 > There is a package, which is "selfcontained". As an example here:
53 > Blender, which can easily be downloaded from builder.blender.org as
54 > *.bz2 archives, is also "selfcontained" as it includes everything,
55 > what it needs to run successfully.
56 >
57 > Despite the fact, that this way of packaging makes a software quite
58 > independant from the layout of the distribution it will be installed
59 > on, the maintainer of that package only support Debian/Ubunto and
60 > has publishes onlu the commands needed to instruct the package
61 > management system of thoses systems to install that software -- as
62 > mentioned -- on Debian/Ubuntu-like systems.
63 >
64 > As I am using Gentoo and wanted that package and didn't found any
65 > other source and this package uses qt4 (included), I asked on this
66 > mailing list for help, how to get access to the physical package,
67 > which I wanted to unpack (low level) and try to get it working
68 > somehow.
69 >
70 > I dont asked on a Debian/Ubuntu mailing list as these are for
71 > questions about -- beside other related things -- installing
72 > packages on Debian/Ubuntu.
73 >
74 > I asked on this mailing list, since I wanted to run that
75 > Debian/Ubuntu package on a Gentoo system.
76 >
77 > Cheers
78 > Meino
79 >
80
81 If you want to install blender, it's in the tree already.  Just emerge it.
82
83 eix blender
84 * media-gfx/blender
85      Available versions:  2.72b-r4 ~2.79 ~2.79-r1 {+boost +bullet
86 collada colorio cuda cycles +dds debug doc +elbeem ffmpeg fftw
87 +game-engine headless jack jemalloc jpeg2k libav llvm man ndof nls
88 openal opencl +openexr openimageio openmp +opennl opensubdiv openvdb osl
89 player redcode sdl sndfile test tiff valgrind CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse sse2"
90 PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_4
91 python3_5 python3_6"}
92      Homepage:            https://www.blender.org
93      Description:         3D Creation/Animation/Publishing System
94
95  
96
97 If you want to install a version not in the tree, some really new
98 experimental/untested release, then you may can take those ebuilds and
99 tweak them to work with the new version.  Sometimes it is as simple as
100 replacing the version but sometimes it is almost a complete rewrite. 
101
102 If you just used blender as a example, ignore this since it may not
103 help.  ;-)
104
105 Dale
106
107 :-)  :-)