1 |
tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
2 |
> On 03/26 09:22, R0b0t1 wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> |
6 |
>>>> On Sunday, March 25, 2018, <tuxic@××××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
>>>>> Hi, |
8 |
>>>>> |
9 |
>>>>> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the |
10 |
>>>>> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the |
11 |
>>>>> apt-get and apt-install commands? |
12 |
>>>>> And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program |
13 |
>>>>> when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?) |
14 |
>>>>> |
15 |
>>>> I've never had this be easy enough I'd want to do it. Is it possible now? |
16 |
>>>> I.e. grabbing all deps wouldn't be necessary if Gentoo's library versions |
17 |
>>>> match the .deb's. |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>> This could just be a language barrier issue, but it isn't entirely |
20 |
>>> clear to me what the question is, and whether it has been answered. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> The original question doesn't seem to have anything to do with Gentoo, |
23 |
>>> so I'm not sure why we're talking about "Gentoo's library versions." |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> If the intent really was to ask how to fetch ubuntu packages for use |
26 |
>>> with ubuntu then it would probably make more sense to ask about it on |
27 |
>>> an Ubuntu list/forum/etc. |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> If this is a Gentoo question and the submitter is just unfamiliar with |
30 |
>>> Gentoo and is using Ubuntu terminology that is fine, but I think it |
31 |
>>> would be helpful to have a bit more clarification, such as what the |
32 |
>>> end goal is. Are we asking for tarballs of sources (distfiles)? Are |
33 |
>>> we asking for binary packages? Is this a question about generating |
34 |
>>> ebuilds for versions not in the main repo? Is this about how to get a |
35 |
>>> .deb made for Ubuntu working on Gentoo? |
36 |
>>> |
37 |
>>> I think everybody is trying to be helpful, but is interpreting the |
38 |
>>> question differently. Perhaps the original submitter already got the |
39 |
>>> answer they're looking for, which is fine. |
40 |
>>> |
41 |
>> Well, yes - I think the question as asked has been answered, but I'm |
42 |
>> trying to figure out what he was doing. I did assume he was going to |
43 |
>> be using the packages with Gentoo somehow, just based on the mailing |
44 |
>> list he used. |
45 |
>> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Hi, |
48 |
> |
49 |
> sorry for my horrific bad English. I will try to explain, what I |
50 |
> intended to do, again. Hopefully this time with more success: |
51 |
> |
52 |
> There is a package, which is "selfcontained". As an example here: |
53 |
> Blender, which can easily be downloaded from builder.blender.org as |
54 |
> *.bz2 archives, is also "selfcontained" as it includes everything, |
55 |
> what it needs to run successfully. |
56 |
> |
57 |
> Despite the fact, that this way of packaging makes a software quite |
58 |
> independant from the layout of the distribution it will be installed |
59 |
> on, the maintainer of that package only support Debian/Ubunto and |
60 |
> has publishes onlu the commands needed to instruct the package |
61 |
> management system of thoses systems to install that software -- as |
62 |
> mentioned -- on Debian/Ubuntu-like systems. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> As I am using Gentoo and wanted that package and didn't found any |
65 |
> other source and this package uses qt4 (included), I asked on this |
66 |
> mailing list for help, how to get access to the physical package, |
67 |
> which I wanted to unpack (low level) and try to get it working |
68 |
> somehow. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> I dont asked on a Debian/Ubuntu mailing list as these are for |
71 |
> questions about -- beside other related things -- installing |
72 |
> packages on Debian/Ubuntu. |
73 |
> |
74 |
> I asked on this mailing list, since I wanted to run that |
75 |
> Debian/Ubuntu package on a Gentoo system. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> Cheers |
78 |
> Meino |
79 |
> |
80 |
|
81 |
If you want to install blender, it's in the tree already. Just emerge it. |
82 |
|
83 |
eix blender |
84 |
* media-gfx/blender |
85 |
Available versions: 2.72b-r4 ~2.79 ~2.79-r1 {+boost +bullet |
86 |
collada colorio cuda cycles +dds debug doc +elbeem ffmpeg fftw |
87 |
+game-engine headless jack jemalloc jpeg2k libav llvm man ndof nls |
88 |
openal opencl +openexr openimageio openmp +opennl opensubdiv openvdb osl |
89 |
player redcode sdl sndfile test tiff valgrind CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse sse2" |
90 |
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_4 |
91 |
python3_5 python3_6"} |
92 |
Homepage: https://www.blender.org |
93 |
Description: 3D Creation/Animation/Publishing System |
94 |
|
95 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
If you want to install a version not in the tree, some really new |
98 |
experimental/untested release, then you may can take those ebuilds and |
99 |
tweak them to work with the new version. Sometimes it is as simple as |
100 |
replacing the version but sometimes it is almost a complete rewrite. |
101 |
|
102 |
If you just used blender as a example, ignore this since it may not |
103 |
help. ;-) |
104 |
|
105 |
Dale |
106 |
|
107 |
:-) :-) |