| 1 |
Neil Bothwick ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:45:20 +0200, b.n. wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>>> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.3 (masked by: package.mask) |
| 5 |
>>>> /usr/portage/local/layman/desktop-effects/profiles/package.mask: |
| 6 |
>>>> # |
| 7 |
>>>> # <jmbsviceto@g.o> (9 February 2008) |
| 8 |
>>>> # glib-2.15 breaks some packages |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword) |
| 11 |
>>>> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword) |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man |
| 14 |
>>>> page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 15 |
>>>> (dependency required by "dev-cpp/glibmm-2.16.1" [ebuild]) |
| 16 |
>>> Sync again, glib-2.16.3 is not masked in the profile here. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> Synced and nothing changed. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Where should I look for? I have no package.mask in /etc/portage. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I've just read the message more carefully and seen the problem, I only |
| 23 |
> noticed the profiles/package.mask part, meaning it is masked in your |
| 24 |
> profile, not /etc/portage, and didn't look carefully at the full path. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> This is masked in a profile from the desktop-effects overlay. It's |
| 27 |
> nothing to do with the official portage tree, but a third-party overlay |
| 28 |
> breaking things for you. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
*slaps head with palm* |
| 31 |
Thanks! How silly was I not reading that. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Now, what should I do? Ask to the desktop-effects guys? And *why* does |
| 34 |
an overlay mask things from the *main* portage tree? Is this normal? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I'm confused. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
m. |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives