| 1 |
Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote |
| 5 |
>>>> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! |
| 6 |
>>>> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test |
| 7 |
>>>> run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, |
| 8 |
>>>> I hope. |
| 9 |
>>> BTW, this has hit Slashdot... |
| 10 |
>>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/11/16/2052203/gentoo-developers-fork-udev |
| 11 |
>> Be sure to read Richard Yao's response: |
| 12 |
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3256499&cid=42006113 |
| 13 |
> I understand that he's still getting the effort organized. I am not a |
| 14 |
> C programmer, but if the effort needs any beta testers, I'm willing to |
| 15 |
> volunteer. BTW, it looks like Lennart Poettering is more unpopular than |
| 16 |
> Steve Ballmer on Slashdot. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thing I like about the fork, if people get fed up with udev, udev falls |
| 20 |
flat on its face or something else causes udev to fail, we have a udev |
| 21 |
already ready. That statement may not be true for another couple months |
| 22 |
or so but at least there is a Gentoo plan B. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Also, I can get rid of dracut too. ;-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Walter, I wonder how much your work helped this along? If you had not |
| 27 |
stepped up and did what you have done, then this fork may have never |
| 28 |
happened. You could have at least let others know there are people |
| 29 |
looking for something else. If so, thanks for that. :-D |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives