| 1 |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote |
| 4 |
> >> |
| 5 |
> >> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! |
| 6 |
> >> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test |
| 7 |
> >> run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, |
| 8 |
> >> I hope. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > BTW, this has hit Slashdot... |
| 11 |
> > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/11/16/2052203/gentoo-developers-fork-udev |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Be sure to read Richard Yao's response: |
| 14 |
> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3256499&cid=42006113 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I understand that he's still getting the effort organized. I am not a |
| 17 |
C programmer, but if the effort needs any beta testers, I'm willing to |
| 18 |
volunteer. BTW, it looks like Lennart Poettering is more unpopular than |
| 19 |
Steve Ballmer on Slashdot. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 23 |
We are apparently better off trying to avoid udev like the plague. |
| 24 |
Linus Torvalds; 2012/10/03 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/349 |
Archives