1 |
On Monday 08 January 2007 11:43, Dan <dan@×××××××××.cx> wrote about 'Re: |
2 |
[gentoo-user] [OT] Router for ssh tunnel/SOCKS proxy': |
3 |
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
> > if you want to take advantage of |
5 |
> > gigabit speeds (or more than a dozen 100mbit ports) you'll definitely |
6 |
> > want a dedicated solution -- the PCI bus just can't keep up. Maybe |
7 |
> > there's a solution in PCIe or PCI-X, since they do increase |
8 |
> > bandwidth, but I've yet to see a standard PC configured to handle |
9 |
> > that much bandwidth. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If you have the router between LAN segments at gigabit speeds, and need |
12 |
> to route more than 132MB/S worth of data transfer |
13 |
|
14 |
Like, moving my rather large collection of video from one computer to |
15 |
another? Or, simply watching HD video from your NAS on 2-3 frontends at |
16 |
the same time? Actually, just about anything involving a NAS and any rael |
17 |
workload. |
18 |
|
19 |
> good luck finding a PC with 10 pci slots so |
20 |
> that you can achieve gigabit speeds on 100-tx hardware ;) |
21 |
|
22 |
You needn't have 10 pci slots. Many companies sell 4-port 10/100 ethernet |
23 |
cards (I have one that a number of years old in the next room). I'm |
24 |
fairly sure higher numbers of ports are available, although they are rare. |
25 |
4-port 10/100/1000 ethernet cards (PCIe or PCI-X, IIRC) are also |
26 |
available. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
"If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
30 |
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
31 |
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
32 |
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |