| 1 |
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:45:15 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > I figured that would make the example more confusion which would |
| 4 |
> > > defeat the purpose. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > And don't get me started on people using "which" when they should be |
| 7 |
> > using "that". |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > (In this case, which is correct but it should have a preceding |
| 10 |
> > comma). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> One could also use "that" with a preceding semicolon. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
One could, although it would subtly change the message, adding more |
| 15 |
emphasis to the second clause. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In a classified ad: "Tired of cleaning yourself? Let me do it." |
Archives