| 1 |
Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:26:25 +0200 |
| 4 |
>> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 14/12/12 14:19, Dale wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> I'm thinking of switching and getting rid of the init thingy |
| 8 |
>>> Huh? |
| 9 |
>> Once upon a time, not so long ago, Dale happened to try and make an |
| 10 |
>> initrd. He followed the rules and the docs and it blew up in his face. |
| 11 |
>> It blew up more in his face than HAL did even longer ago (and that was |
| 12 |
>> pretty spectacular). |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Somewhere in that thread the words "init thingy" were used in |
| 15 |
>> frustration, and it's since become a meme, a disparaging reference to |
| 16 |
>> initrd for those who don't like the idea of them. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Dale is getting famous at this, if ever we need someone to find the |
| 19 |
>> really bad bugs in basic software, just mark it stable enough so that |
| 20 |
>> Dale will use it. He will find the bugs that no-one else ever could, |
| 21 |
>> it's just a knack he has. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Long live Dale. |
| 24 |
> Hear! Hear! |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Dale, would you be interested in jobs doing software testing? If I see |
| 27 |
> openings, I'd be happy to forward them your way... |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> :wq |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I thought I did that already. ROFL |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives