1 |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:26:25 +0200 |
3 |
> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 14/12/12 14:19, Dale wrote: |
6 |
>> > I'm thinking of switching and getting rid of the init thingy |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Huh? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Once upon a time, not so long ago, Dale happened to try and make an |
11 |
> initrd. He followed the rules and the docs and it blew up in his face. |
12 |
> It blew up more in his face than HAL did even longer ago (and that was |
13 |
> pretty spectacular). |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Somewhere in that thread the words "init thingy" were used in |
16 |
> frustration, and it's since become a meme, a disparaging reference to |
17 |
> initrd for those who don't like the idea of them. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Dale is getting famous at this, if ever we need someone to find the |
20 |
> really bad bugs in basic software, just mark it stable enough so that |
21 |
> Dale will use it. He will find the bugs that no-one else ever could, |
22 |
> it's just a knack he has. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Long live Dale. |
25 |
|
26 |
Hear! Hear! |
27 |
|
28 |
Dale, would you be interested in jobs doing software testing? If I see |
29 |
openings, I'd be happy to forward them your way... |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
:wq |