| 1 |
On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local |
| 6 |
>>>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so. |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to satisfy |
| 9 |
>>> XFCE_PLUGINS=battery/brightness. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> That's not it. Portage doesn't work like that. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> It's because he specifically keyworded 1.3.1 in package.keywords, |
| 16 |
>> instead using something smart like: |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> <xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-9999 |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> To get latest non-live version. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> I'm not necessarily after the most recent non-live version of the package. |
| 23 |
> I just didn't want lvm2 pulled in as my current setup has no use for it. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> What would you recommend doing, leave things as they are, or keyword |
| 26 |
> the stanza you suggested? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Thanks. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Notice that I said "_non_-live" and the "<" char in the line. I would |
| 32 |
use the stanza (as you said) |
| 33 |
because if 1.4.0 is not stabilized before something like 1.4.1 is added |
| 34 |
to tree, and 1.4.0 gets |
| 35 |
deleted, you are facing the same problem all over again. |
| 36 |
As in, <xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-9999 with the < means "I want |
| 37 |
latest non-live version." |
Archives