| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local |
| 6 |
>>> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>> Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to satisfy |
| 9 |
>> XFCE_PLUGINS=battery/brightness. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That's not it. Portage doesn't work like that. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It's because he specifically keyworded 1.3.1 in package.keywords, |
| 17 |
> instead using something smart like: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> <xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager-9999 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> To get latest non-live version. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I'm not necessarily after the most recent non-live version of the package. |
| 24 |
I just didn't want lvm2 pulled in as my current setup has no use for it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
What would you recommend doing, leave things as they are, or keyword |
| 27 |
the stanza you suggested? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks. |
Archives