| 1 |
On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 17:11:36 felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:14:22PM +0000, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday 24 Jan 2012 17:08:43 felix@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > I'm not entirely clear of your use case scenarios and the constraints you |
| 6 |
> > are trying to address with a proxy (e.g. why the developer does not |
| 7 |
> > connect directly to the vendors port(s) to access their service? ) but |
| 8 |
> > I'll guess that |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Because if the devs connect directly to the vendor, they will take |
| 11 |
> over the limited connections we are allowed. Thus they need |
| 12 |
> throttling and/or some kind of NAT. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
OK, I understand now. I guess some reverse proxies offer the ability to |
| 15 |
throttle throughput and/or you can also apply QoS so that internal connections |
| 16 |
to the vendors are always given priority, while external connections coming |
| 17 |
from the devs are constrained appropriately. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Mick |
Archives