| 1 |
Rumen Yotov wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:29:17 -0300 |
| 3 |
> Jos__ Pablo Ezequiel Fern__ndez <pablo.fernandez@××××××××××××.ar> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:21, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>>no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small |
| 9 |
>>>files (like portage tree) than ext2/3. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>Any numbers you can post ? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hi, |
| 14 |
> Some time ago there was such 'subject' with some data to confirm it. |
| 15 |
> Now: "#du -h --exclude=packages --exclude=distfiles /var/portage/" |
| 16 |
> Result=434M. This is on reiserfs-3.6 with tail packing ON. |
| 17 |
> Note: my portage directory is in /var not /usr |
| 18 |
> Rumen |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
confirmed: |
| 21 |
reiserfs = 434M |
| 22 |
ext3 = 516M |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
having reiserfs = 100M : |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
100 -- 118.89 |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives