Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rumen Yotov <rumen_yotov@×××.bg>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:51:24
Message-Id: 20050928205209.42322bd5@mach.qrypto.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree by "José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández"
1 On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:29:17 -0300
2 Jos__ Pablo Ezequiel Fern__ndez <pablo.fernandez@××××××××××××.ar> wrote:
3
4 > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:21, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
5 > > no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small
6 > > files (like portage tree) than ext2/3.
7 > Any numbers you can post ?
8 Hi,
9 Some time ago there was such 'subject' with some data to confirm it.
10 Now: "#du -h --exclude=packages --exclude=distfiles /var/portage/"
11 Result=434M. This is on reiserfs-3.6 with tail packing ON.
12 Note: my portage directory is in /var not /usr
13 Rumen

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree Bastian Balthazar Bux <BastianBalthazarBux@×××××××××.it>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree "A. Khattri" <ajai@××××.net>