Archives
Archives
| From: | "José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández" <pablo.fernandez@××××××××××××.ar> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:34:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200509281429.17678.pablo.fernandez@reliable.com.ar | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree by "Hemmann | ||
| 1 | On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:21, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 2 | > no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files |
| 3 | > (like portage tree) than ext2/3. |
| 4 | Any numbers you can post ? |
| 5 | -- |
| 6 | José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | Rumen Yotov <rumen_yotov@×××.bg> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | "Hemmann |