Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:06:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100209133448.019a633a@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far by Stroller |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +0000, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > > With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it, |
| 4 | > > rinse and |
| 5 | > > repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Aren't you thinking of LVM, or something? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | No. The very nature of RAID is redundancy, so you could remove one disk |
| 10 | from the array to modify its setup then replace it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad |
| 17 | "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> |