Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:09:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 63F56C2B-97D3-4A98-9338-ED1D82FFAB1E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am |
| 6 | >> now |
| 7 | >> suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts |
| 8 | >> of my RAID5) are starting on sector 63 and I don't have sufficient |
| 9 | >> free space (or free time) to repartition them? :) |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it, |
| 12 | > rinse and |
| 13 | > repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Aren't you thinking of LVM, or something? |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] 1-Terabyte drives - 4K sector sizes? -> bar performance so far | "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> |