1 |
Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> ...and the novice was buffled and even the master shifted a little bit |
5 |
> after recognizing this words of the eternal being named emerge. |
6 |
> I know, that there is a difference in knowing the path and walking the |
7 |
> path, but it seems that I am not supposed to understand this: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB |
15 |
> |
16 |
> WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> dev-util/boost-build:0 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> (dev-util/boost-build-1.60.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with |
21 |
> =dev-util/boost-build-1.58* required by (dev-libs/boost-1.58.0-r1:0/1.58.0::gentoo, installed) |
22 |
> ^ ^^^^^ |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> !!! The following update has been skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> dev-libs/boost:0 |
28 |
> |
29 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-util/boost-build-1.60*" have been masked. |
30 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: |
31 |
> - dev-util/boost-build-1.60.0::gentoo (masked by: ) |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> For me it looks like boost not beeing updated/reinstalled because of |
35 |
> another version of boost, which depends on boost. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> HELP, I need somebody, HELP, not just anybody hee-eee-eelp uuuuuhhhh! |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Thanks for any HELP in advance! May the source be with you... |
40 |
> Best regards, |
41 |
> Meino |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
Notice this line. |
47 |
|
48 |
=dev-util/boost-build-1.58* required by (dev-libs/boost-1.58.0-r1:0/1.58.0::gentoo, installed) |
49 |
^ ^^^^^ |
50 |
|
51 |
Note the ^ and the ^^^^^ part. That seems to be the important part. |
52 |
Me, I would check package.* files and see if there is a entry for boost |
53 |
in there. It seems to be pointing out that there is a problem with that |
54 |
specific version and a = sign somewhere. It could be a keyword that |
55 |
only applies to that version and it needs a newer version keyworded or |
56 |
there could be a entry in package.use that has a version attached to |
57 |
it. I might add, I try not to put versions on packages in package.use. |
58 |
It just seems to lead to trouble. May want to check package.mask too if |
59 |
you find nothing in the other files. |
60 |
|
61 |
Also a -t might help too. Maybe. |
62 |
|
63 |
If that doesn't help, Alan M. will come along with his crystal ball |
64 |
soon, I hope. |
65 |
|
66 |
Dale |
67 |
|
68 |
:-) :-) |