Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Vladimir Rusinov <vladimir@×××××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why is postgresql so old?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:53:52
Message-Id: f6fdfb550810250953p2ff3dca7n7027b67c510d06c8@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Why is postgresql so old? by Nickolay Hodyunya
1 On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Nickolay Hodyunya <nickolayh@×××××.com>wrote:
2
3 > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
4 > > Hi,
5 > >
6 > > I know I can activate newer version with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, but why is
7 > postgres
8 > > at gentoo still at version 8.0 when the most current release is 8.3. Are
9 > > there stability issues?
10 > according to http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
11 > postgresql major version upgrades requires dump and restores, so it
12 > should be upgrade issues. If you are going to use newer release, you
13 > can install it, but in my opinion most of production servers requires
14 > only minor version upgrades for bug fixes.
15 >
16
17 Hmm...
18 May be slotting would be a good idea?
19
20 I like the way how it done in ubuntu (with some kind of extra overlay): it
21 is possible to install e.g. 8.2 and 8.3 at the same time, and they would use
22 different init scripts (with version suffix), different configs and
23 everything different.
24
25 --
26 Vladimir Rusinov
27 http://greenmice.info/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Why is postgresql so old? Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de>