| 1 |
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:19:16 +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > This seems more elegant than a separate init script, but do you want |
| 4 |
> > it to return 0 unconditionally? If the modules fail to load, surely |
| 5 |
> > you want the attempt to bring the interface up to abort? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> In my head I find it less elegant to be honest. Is it up to a network |
| 8 |
> configuration script to load the *kernel* module for the hardware? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Is it up to an init script to do that either? I'd say no. either way |
| 11 |
seems wrong, but having the network config check that the interface is |
| 12 |
available before trying to bring it up seems somewhat less wrong. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I |
| 19 |
can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." |
Archives