1 |
On Monday 06 December 2004 19:23, Jean-Francois Gagnon Laporte wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:47:43 +0100, Maarten <gentoo@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > I think I correctly upgraded 2004.2 to 2004.3 but how do I check that to |
5 |
> > make sure? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Okay let's divide the questions shall we. There isn't really any |
8 |
> revision to gentoo. I think you have switched your profile am I right |
9 |
|
10 |
If that is what I think it is, yes. [Changing some symlink somewhere I forgot] |
11 |
|
12 |
> > The machine did not do anything spectacular when I made that change, |
13 |
> > is that expected behaviour ? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If you were up to date with your local portage tree and recently |
16 |
> update your installation there is no reason to anything since you |
17 |
> already up to date. You only switched profile from what I can read. |
18 |
|
19 |
indeed. So the kernel is not updated with changing profiles ? |
20 |
(or at least, not when going from 2004.2 to 2004.3) |
21 |
|
22 |
> > Now for the fullfillment of the transition to 2004.3 I need a kernel |
23 |
> > 2.6, right ? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Not really, AFAIK gentoo hasn't switched to 2.6 by default. If you |
26 |
> still need to you can run a 2.4 kernel without any problems except you |
27 |
> will miss some goodies. But, if you aren't confortable with 2.6 or |
28 |
> even a linux kernel you might want to stick with a 2.4 kernel. It just |
29 |
> works. |
30 |
|
31 |
I run linux kernels since 1996, so I should be "comfortable" with them. ;-) |
32 |
I (wrongly) assumed gentoo-latest-rev used a 2.6 kernel so I was unsure how to |
33 |
transistion to 2004.3. So, that is cleared up now. |
34 |
However, I will still want to run with 2.6, definitely. |
35 |
|
36 |
> > Can someone point me to the docs that |
37 |
> > detail that step cause I could not find that very well. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Sure here ya go. It still has that fresh smell from the oven (It has |
40 |
> been updated recently) |
41 |
> |
42 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/migration-to-2.6.xml |
43 |
> |
44 |
> May I suggest you go to www.gentoo.org and look at the left side of |
45 |
> the navbar to see a big category called Documentation. Check out the |
46 |
> user docs section it's pretty good. |
47 |
|
48 |
Of course I did. In fact I couldn't have installed gentoo without it. :-) |
49 |
(Those are real fine docs by the way. Kudos!) |
50 |
Somehow I overlooked that migration document. I guess it's just all too new |
51 |
and confusing and overwhelming the first few visits... My bad. Thanks! |
52 |
|
53 |
> > How do I make sure I retain my current kernel as a second boot option if |
54 |
> > the 2.6 kernel will not boot ? |
55 |
> |
56 |
> What boot loader are you using ? Lilo or grub ? Here's my grub.conf |
57 |
> that you might find useful : |
58 |
|
59 |
Grub.conf will work. My question was rather, will one kernel not overwrite |
60 |
another (as is sadly the case with a lot of other linux distributions). |
61 |
|
62 |
One last question: Do you need to re-run grub-install after changing this |
63 |
file or is it 'okay to go'. (you'll note I come from the lilo world ;-) |
64 |
|
65 |
> |
66 |
> Hopes this will help you out |
67 |
|
68 |
Yes, I think it did. Thanks again. |
69 |
|
70 |
> Jean-Francois |
71 |
|
72 |
Maarten |
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |