1 |
On 2010-07-02, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
3 |
>> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes: |
4 |
>> > Grant Edwards wrote: |
5 |
>> >> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht<nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net> wrote: |
6 |
>> >>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
7 |
>> >>> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing |
8 |
>> >>> lists I use don't do that. |
9 |
>> >>> |
10 |
>> >>> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it |
11 |
>> >>> permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole |
12 |
>> >>> mailing list. |
13 |
|
14 |
> Or, he could use a mailer that understands mailing lists, like kmail. There |
15 |
> are others. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Filter list mail into a folder, and tell the mailer it is for a list. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Decide how you want to reply and press (the composer deals with it correctly): |
20 |
> |
21 |
> l - reply to list |
22 |
> a - reply to all |
23 |
> R - reply to original sender |
24 |
> r - reply to whatever seems to be default reply address. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> So instead of blindly clicking reply and getting all upset about the |
27 |
> outcome, just press one key and the mailer obeys YOUR intent. |
28 |
|
29 |
His intent is to receive direct replies to his posts. I don't see how |
30 |
his choice of mail client has any impact on that. |
31 |
|
32 |
> Problem solved. |
33 |
|
34 |
Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change what |
35 |
happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" to |
36 |
contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a |
37 |
direct response and doesn't have to bother to check the mailing list |
38 |
for replies. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Hey, wait |
42 |
at a minute!! I want a |
43 |
gmail.com divorce!! ... you're not |
44 |
Clint Eastwood!! |