Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: -Os = Nono?
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:15:22
Message-Id: 20070724090505.76622747@zaphod.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: -Os = Nono? by Grant Edwards
1 On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:57:06 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
2
3 > I haven't measured it for IA32, but for a couple other
4 > architectures I have, and -Os generated consistently larger
5 > code than -O2. Using -O3 ballooned up to be quite a bit larger
6 > than both -Os and -O2, but if you're worried about size, -O2
7 > usually seems to be the best choice.
8
9 I've just tried it on a few PPC packages and, on balance, there was a
10 small space saving, although it was hardly enough to get excited about.
11
12
13 --
14 Neil Bothwick
15
16 There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature