1 |
On 2007-07-23, Zsitvai János <zsitvaij@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Have you actually measured the gain? Emerge some thing with |
4 |
> Os, qsize the package, emerge it with O2, qsize again? I went |
5 |
> back to O2 from Os when it became apparent that the resulting |
6 |
> binaries were actually _larger_. On every single package I |
7 |
> tried. |
8 |
|
9 |
I haven't measured it for IA32, but for a couple other |
10 |
architectures I have, and -Os generated consistently larger |
11 |
code than -O2. Using -O3 ballooned up to be quite a bit larger |
12 |
than both -Os and -O2, but if you're worried about size, -O2 |
13 |
usually seems to be the best choice. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ... this must be what |
17 |
at it's like to be a COLLEGE |
18 |
visi.com GRADUATE!! |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |