Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:33:52
Message-Id: 4788A584.8020300@bellsouth.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?) by Mick
1 Mick wrote:
2 >
3 > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all these
4 > moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would be
5 > considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking
6 > either . . .
7 >
8 > To Dale: have you tried setting up new addresses in the Seamonkey's Address
9 > Book with <gentoo-user@l.g.o> and <gentoo-user@g.o> and for
10 > each of these select to only send plain text messages?
11 >
12 > From previous threads I remember that you can send plain text when you respond
13 > to a plain text message in this ML, but not otherwise. This could be that
14 > you do not have both addresses above set up to only send plain text format.
15 >
16 > WARNING: I have not yet used Seamonkey, but vaguely remember something like
17 > this in the old Mozilla/Netscape features.
18 >
19 > HTH.
20 >
21
22 Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can
23 you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text,
24 hopefully only plain text.
25
26 Neat trick. ;-)
27
28 Dale
29
30 :-) :-)
31 --
32 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?) Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?) Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>