| 1 |
Hello! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I have found the source of my problem: |
| 4 |
I've not a wifi card integrated in my laptop and so I'm using a usb dongle |
| 5 |
with ndiswrapper driver. |
| 6 |
And it's when this usb key is plugged that the acpi temperature is growing |
| 7 |
and it don't happens if it's a classic usb key (storage for example) which |
| 8 |
is plugged. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So we have changed the problem! |
| 11 |
But it is not resolved :( |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So do you have any idea for this problem?? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thank you for your help! |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
>From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de> |
| 19 |
>Reply-To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 20 |
>To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 21 |
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Thermal cpu |
| 22 |
>Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:24:10 +0200 |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>Hi, |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:05:09 +0200 "Sylvain Chouleur" |
| 27 |
><neolistic@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> > I tried to install and use lm_sensors but it don't detect any sensors. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
>Since there are really lots of drivers, I just guess you didn't compile |
| 32 |
>the right ones when building your kernel. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> > Moreover, I think it's a problem of acpi or the kernel configuration |
| 35 |
> > because on my debian, I don't use lm_sensors, just acpi. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
>That's two completely different things. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> > May be detection is bad made or may be cpu id bad used, but top show |
| 40 |
> > me that: |
| 41 |
> > [...] |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
>?!? How does "top" come into play here?!? |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> > and acpi -t: |
| 46 |
> > Thermal 1: ok, 65.0 degrees C |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
>OK, so ACPI temperature zone support is working. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> > And at this state, on debian, the thermal is at 53 degrees C so and |
| 51 |
> > don't understand. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
>If that's why you posted top output: It doesn't depend on absolute |
| 54 |
>load. Maybe your debian box enables throttling, either ACPI P-States, |
| 55 |
>or CPUfreq. You might want to play with the cpufreq ondemand governor |
| 56 |
>(there's also an alternative implementation, read the docs of those |
| 57 |
>kernel options) or cpufreqd. |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
> > Is there some option to activate in the kernel to support better the |
| 60 |
> > thermal or cpu use? |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
>CPUfreq, see above. And it certainly won't make CPU use better (it |
| 63 |
>throttles) -- but might lower the temperature. |
| 64 |
> |
| 65 |
>-hwh |
| 66 |
>-- |
| 67 |
>gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 68 |
> |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
_________________________________________________________________ |
| 71 |
Ten : Messenger en illimité sur votre mobile ! |
| 72 |
http://mobile.live.fr/messenger/ten/ |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-- |
| 75 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives