| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:05:09 +0200 "Sylvain Chouleur" |
| 4 |
<neolistic@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I tried to install and use lm_sensors but it don't detect any sensors. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Since there are really lots of drivers, I just guess you didn't compile |
| 9 |
the right ones when building your kernel. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Moreover, I think it's a problem of acpi or the kernel configuration |
| 12 |
> because on my debian, I don't use lm_sensors, just acpi. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's two completely different things. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> May be detection is bad made or may be cpu id bad used, but top show |
| 17 |
> me that: |
| 18 |
> [...] |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
?!? How does "top" come into play here?!? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> and acpi -t: |
| 23 |
> Thermal 1: ok, 65.0 degrees C |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
OK, so ACPI temperature zone support is working. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> And at this state, on debian, the thermal is at 53 degrees C so and |
| 28 |
> don't understand. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If that's why you posted top output: It doesn't depend on absolute |
| 31 |
load. Maybe your debian box enables throttling, either ACPI P-States, |
| 32 |
or CPUfreq. You might want to play with the cpufreq ondemand governor |
| 33 |
(there's also an alternative implementation, read the docs of those |
| 34 |
kernel options) or cpufreqd. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> Is there some option to activate in the kernel to support better the |
| 37 |
> thermal or cpu use? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
CPUfreq, see above. And it certainly won't make CPU use better (it |
| 40 |
throttles) -- but might lower the temperature. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-hwh |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives