1 |
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Nuno J. Silva <nunojsilva@×××××××.pt> wrote: |
2 |
> On 2012-12-24, Michael Mol wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Nuno J. Silva <nunojsilva@×××××××.pt> wrote: |
5 |
>>> On 2012-12-24, Dale wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
> [...] |
8 |
>>>> From my understanding, if I upgrade my system to the later version of |
9 |
>>>> udev and bypass the init system, my system will not boot. I have not |
10 |
>>>> tested the theory but that is what people have been saying. Not only is |
11 |
>>>> my /usr separate but it is on LVM partitons too. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Your problem would be LVM (if that's an issue at all, as I said I don't |
14 |
>>> know LVM), you'd not need udevd to mount /usr if it were a regular |
15 |
>>> partition. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> "you wouldn't have this problem if you did *something else*" is a |
18 |
>> terrible response. There are very good reasons to use LVM. There are |
19 |
>> good (IMO, at least) reasons to avoid using an initr* on Gentoo. |
20 |
>> (Those reasons are sprinkled through the thread, some spoken by me, |
21 |
>> some spoken by others.) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> A shame that was not what I meant at all, the only thing I said was |
24 |
> "yes, the problem is probably caused by it being on LVM, not because of |
25 |
> /usr being separate". Just pointing the specific part of Dale's config |
26 |
> that would be the problem. |
27 |
|
28 |
Miscommunication, then. Happens. :) |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
:wq |