1 |
> |
2 |
>> > The main correlation I've seen so far is with dhcpcd. Sometimes at my |
3 |
>> > work I get a 192. IP (which doesn't work), and other times I get a |
4 |
>> > 133. IP (which is correct). In fact, sometimes dhcp is giving me an |
5 |
>> > IP address and resolv.conf related to a university I was visiting like |
6 |
>> > a month ago. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> It sounds like someone at your work might be (accidentally) running a |
9 |
>> rogue DHCP server... |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> For the 192 address - yeah, someone has probably plugged a WLAN or ADSL |
13 |
> router into the local network, and other people will be have the same |
14 |
> problem. If they were purposely running a rogue DHCP server to perform a Man |
15 |
> In the Middle attack you wouldn't notice any connectivity problems (assuming |
16 |
> they set it up correctly). |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Yes. I was getting the wireless IP. Turns out my officemate had |
20 |
turned off the dhcp server. >_< |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> Getting the university address is very odd. AFAIK dhcpcd has no function to |
24 |
> fall back to the address from an expired lease. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Grep your logs for dhcpcd and post the result. |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
I found the outdated static configuration file. Woops! |
30 |
|
31 |
Well, so that was a very silly problem! Non-commented dated |
32 |
configuration file and broken dhcp server. But the behavior was so |
33 |
random. And I never new that the DNS lookup would delay logins. So |
34 |
that was very educational. |
35 |
|
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
daid |