1 |
William Kenworthy wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 14:55 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
3 |
>> Who actually speaks on the list. As far as we know, maybe the only |
4 |
>> Gentoo users disagreeing with the changes are the ones saying so on |
5 |
>> the list. We don't know. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> ok, as one of the silent ones on this topic so far, I'll chime in. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Dont assume that the silent majority are in favour - they just might be |
10 |
> on the other side. Perhaps others who disagree can say "me too" in |
11 |
> order to support Dale who has been carrying the argument very well. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> > From my point of view, its looking like I will have to redesign a number |
14 |
> of systems to take this into a/c, expose those systems to a proven |
15 |
> higher risk of failure* all because of some corner cases that dont apply |
16 |
> to me or the majority and perhaps the biggest point is that I have no |
17 |
> choice in the matter, and possibly no choice about when it will happen. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I wonder if going back to a static /dev is still possible. Server |
20 |
> hardware doesnt change much once in service so its a once only hit to |
21 |
> set it up. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I dont mind that you want to use systemd and an initramfs - but I dont, |
24 |
> and I dont want to be forced to go along with you. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> BillK |
27 |
> |
28 |
> * my biggest failure when doing sys admin tasks at a workplace involved |
29 |
> initrd's - now I do not use them on gentoo (I dont have a choice on the |
30 |
> ubuntu systems), and guess what ... Ive never had an initrd failure on |
31 |
> gentoo since :) I know initramfs isnt initrd, but the exposure is the |
32 |
> same. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
The init system was one reason I left Mandriva too. To have to go back |
36 |
to using one just makes me wonder if I should have stuck with it and all |
37 |
the headaches. I really like Gentoo but it is going in the direction of |
38 |
being like all the rest with the addition of compiling everything. |
39 |
|
40 |
What will be next I wonder. |
41 |
|
42 |
Dale |
43 |
|
44 |
:-) :-) |