| 1 |
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:39:58 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > No, it was the decision Red Hat made before they sold distros with X |
| 4 |
> > year support contracts, to provide a guaranteed level of support to |
| 5 |
> > their customers. Someone mentioned that 62% of KDE devs are unpaid, |
| 6 |
> > who do you think pays the other 38%. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> So they did make the decision to continue support for KDE 3. OK. So |
| 10 |
> what? I wish them the best of luck. KDE still stopped the support. |
| 11 |
> Anything else you say will not change that fact. Again, Redhat is only |
| 12 |
> picking it up because KDE isn't doing it. That's what you just said. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It's not what I said. Red Hat commit to support all software they supply, |
| 15 |
irrespective of upstream decisions. It is reasonable to assume that the |
| 16 |
distros that employ and pay KDE developers are happy with the way things |
| 17 |
are going, otherwise they would discontinue their support. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What did the first man to discover you can get milk from cows think he |
| 24 |
was doing? - anon. |
Archives