| 1 |
Mike Myers wrote: |
| 2 |
> I just wanted to add something to the original post. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their |
| 5 |
> updating system is exactly like what I was asking about. Basically, |
| 6 |
> there's package updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it |
| 7 |
> unreasonable for Gentoo to have something like this? I think it would |
| 8 |
> help Gentoo a lot in the server market, where scalability is important. |
| 9 |
If Debian does what you want then why not go with it? What would be the |
| 10 |
point in making Gentoo like Debian? Gentoo offers a different approach |
| 11 |
which many of us like. It's all about choice - if you like Debian, |
| 12 |
choose it - but don't expect Gentoo to turn into a Debian clone. It's |
| 13 |
not going to happen. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives