1 |
On 12/31/06, Mark Kirkwood <markir@××××××××××××.nz> wrote:Mike Myers wrote: |
2 |
> > I just wanted to add something to the original post. |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their updating |
5 |
> > system is exactly like what I was asking about. Basically, there's |
6 |
> > package updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it |
7 |
> > unreasonable for Gentoo to have something like this? I think it would |
8 |
> > help Gentoo a lot in the server market, where scalability is important. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> While this is true, one of the differentiating points of Gentoo is |
11 |
> precisely the build-from-source idea (there are plenty of binary update |
12 |
> distros out there). |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
I'm not trying to suggest that Gentoo should go to a binary distro or |
16 |
anything like that. Besides, it's easy enough to just use a binary package |
17 |
server if that's what one needs. I'm just wondering why there isn't some |
18 |
kind of update management system to like, differentiate minor updates like |
19 |
firefox 1.5.0.5 to firefox 1.5.0.7 and major ones like, y'know, gcc 3.4.4 to |
20 |
4+? The way it is now, they're all lumped together like one big update. |
21 |
The lack of such a system might make it easier for the devs.. but this is a |
22 |
pain in the ass for the users when they run into a problem like this |
23 |
unexpectedly. It's even worse when that user is managing several Gentoo |
24 |
machines. This kind of thing does not scale at all. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
One other thing - to actually do what you are suggesting requires a fair |
28 |
> number of extra volunteers to maintain these package updates. Now I'm |
29 |
> not saying its not possible, or even a bad idea mind - just wore work... |
30 |
> and maybe that effort might be better spent on keeping the current |
31 |
> momentum and quality of Gentoo as it is (or improving it)... |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Cheers |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Mark |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
I don't see why it would take that much work. If the tree was versioned, |
41 |
then the profile could be more significant with what was updated. Like, in |
42 |
the ebuild it could have a single additional entry for a minimum profile. |
43 |
Then, that user won't have to deal with that update until they update their |
44 |
profile. I'm sure there's other ways of doing that, but from what I've seen |
45 |
of portage and it's scripts, it is quite flexible for changes such as this. |
46 |
If anything, this could just be a gradual addition to new scripts instead of |
47 |
editing each and every ebuild. Whatever the solution is if there is going |
48 |
to be one at all should not be a complicated one, or it would defeat the |
49 |
purpose altogether. |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
On 12/31/06, Neil Walker <neil@×××××××.nu> wrote: |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Mike Myers wrote: |
55 |
> > I just wanted to add something to the original post. |
56 |
> > |
57 |
> > I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their |
58 |
> > updating system is exactly like what I was asking about. Basically, |
59 |
> > there's package updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it |
60 |
> > unreasonable for Gentoo to have something like this? I think it would |
61 |
> > help Gentoo a lot in the server market, where scalability is important. |
62 |
> If Debian does what you want then why not go with it? What would be the |
63 |
> point in making Gentoo like Debian? Gentoo offers a different approach |
64 |
> which many of us like. It's all about choice - if you like Debian, |
65 |
> choose it - but don't expect Gentoo to turn into a Debian clone. It's |
66 |
> not going to happen. |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> -- |
70 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
71 |
> |
72 |
> |
73 |
|
74 |
The update system is the -only- nice thing about it over Gentoo. Debian is |
75 |
nowhere near Gentoo when it comes to everything else (especially docs). I |
76 |
don't think suggesting a single feature that another distro has and putting |
77 |
into Gentoo is trying to make it a clone. I'm just asking for a relief from |
78 |
having to constantly worry if updating something out of the 300 packages |
79 |
that need updated is going to break something, and not having to make sure |
80 |
etc-update isn't going to destroy my custom configs afterwards. If it |
81 |
wasn't for that, Gentoo would be perfect. I'm sure there's got to be others |
82 |
that would agree. |