1 |
I totally agree to neil's assessment. Mike certainly has point that |
2 |
Debian is more mature in some aspects (is has been around since '93). |
3 |
That being said it is lacking so much in other departments that for me |
4 |
it is no serious alternative to Gentoo (difficulty installing source |
5 |
packages not in the apt repositories, inferior security support in |
6 |
comparison to Gentoo to name a few). |
7 |
|
8 |
I really believe we should give Gentoo some time to evolve (Gentoo was |
9 |
first released in 2002) In time gentoo will become more mature and |
10 |
better fit to our needs. In order to achieve this however we all need to |
11 |
put an effort into making Gentoo the best distro available. So please |
12 |
stop talking and get moving. Open a thread, mobilize people, contact |
13 |
aforementioned Gentoo businesses. _Contribute_ in any way possible to |
14 |
realize the features you envision. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> On 12/31/06, *Neil Walker* <neil@×××××××.nu <mailto:neil@×××××××.nu>> |
19 |
> wrote: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Mike Myers wrote: |
22 |
> > I just wanted to add something to the original post. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their |
25 |
> > updating system is exactly like what I was asking |
26 |
> about. Basically, |
27 |
> > there's package updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it |
28 |
> > unreasonable for Gentoo to have something like this? I think it |
29 |
> would |
30 |
> > help Gentoo a lot in the server market, where scalability is |
31 |
> important. |
32 |
> If Debian does what you want then why not go with it? What would |
33 |
> be the |
34 |
> point in making Gentoo like Debian? Gentoo offers a different approach |
35 |
> which many of us like. It's all about choice - if you like Debian, |
36 |
> choose it - but don't expect Gentoo to turn into a Debian clone. It's |
37 |
> not going to happen. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> gentoo-user@g.o <mailto:gentoo-user@g.o> mailing list |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> The update system is the -only- nice thing about it over Gentoo. |
46 |
> Debian is nowhere near Gentoo when it comes to everything else |
47 |
> (especially docs). I don't think suggesting a single feature that |
48 |
> another distro has and putting into Gentoo is trying to make it a |
49 |
> clone. I'm just asking for a relief from having to constantly worry |
50 |
> if updating something out of the 300 packages that need updated is |
51 |
> going to break something, and not having to make sure etc-update isn't |
52 |
> going to destroy my custom configs afterwards. If it wasn't for that, |
53 |
> Gentoo would be perfect. I'm sure there's got to be others that would |
54 |
> agree. |