1 |
On 16/02/2014 20:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
>> On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote: |
5 |
>>> On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>>> For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> 1. sysvinit (status quo) |
9 |
>>>> 2. systemd |
10 |
>>>> 3. upstart |
11 |
>>>> 4. openrc (experimental) |
12 |
>>>> 5. One system on Linux, something else on non-linux |
13 |
>>>> 6. multiple |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> It should also be noted that no one in the TC voted OpenRC above |
16 |
>>>> systemd AND upstart, and that while a couple voted systemd below |
17 |
>>>> everything else, it can be argued that it was a tactical vote. |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>>> Regards. |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> [1]https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/ |
22 |
>>> I would really, really, REALLY like to see a thorough, civil debate |
23 |
>>> involving those far more knowledgeable than I on the pros and cons of |
24 |
>>> systemd vs OpenRC... |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> As it seems to me, the Debian OpenRC page says that the cons are not |
27 |
>>> nearly as large as the systemd proponents would have us believe. |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/openrc |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> I don't know much about systemd, I do know openrc. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> Thus far, the only real actual benefit I have seen of systemd that is a |
34 |
>> real issue that really affects me is consolekit. It's not exactly the |
35 |
>> best piece of software out there, comparable to HAL and how it was |
36 |
>> replaced by udev. So systemd replaces and fixes consolekit by providing |
37 |
>> logind. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> ConsoleKit works just fine for the features it advertises to have, where |
40 |
> as HAL never did, |
41 |
> so I really don't know what you are referring to? |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
It's a poor design. It's also unmaintained currently. |
45 |
|
46 |
But I don't want to debate consolekit, it's OT for this thread. It runs |
47 |
on my machines currently because ebuilds pulled it in. It seems to do |
48 |
what it should, so for the moment I'm happy to leave it in place. But I |
49 |
don't regard it as a good design, it's one of those things I list in the |
50 |
risk register in my head and keep an eye on as I consider it brittle. |
51 |
|
52 |
I only brought it up as an example, an illustration of my position. If |
53 |
you feel it's a lousy analogy then so be it, but I'd rather not detract |
54 |
from the topic of the thread, which is systemd. |
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
Alan McKinnon |
59 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |