| 1 |
On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> 1. sysvinit (status quo) |
| 7 |
>>> 2. systemd |
| 8 |
>>> 3. upstart |
| 9 |
>>> 4. openrc (experimental) |
| 10 |
>>> 5. One system on Linux, something else on non-linux |
| 11 |
>>> 6. multiple |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> It should also be noted that no one in the TC voted OpenRC above |
| 14 |
>>> systemd AND upstart, and that while a couple voted systemd below |
| 15 |
>>> everything else, it can be argued that it was a tactical vote. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Regards. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> [1]https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/ |
| 20 |
>> I would really, really, REALLY like to see a thorough, civil debate |
| 21 |
>> involving those far more knowledgeable than I on the pros and cons of |
| 22 |
>> systemd vs OpenRC... |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> As it seems to me, the Debian OpenRC page says that the cons are not |
| 25 |
>> nearly as large as the systemd proponents would have us believe. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/openrc |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I don't know much about systemd, I do know openrc. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Thus far, the only real actual benefit I have seen of systemd that is a |
| 32 |
> real issue that really affects me is consolekit. It's not exactly the |
| 33 |
> best piece of software out there, comparable to HAL and how it was |
| 34 |
> replaced by udev. So systemd replaces and fixes consolekit by providing |
| 35 |
> logind. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
ConsoleKit works just fine for the features it advertises to have, where |
| 38 |
as HAL never did, |
| 39 |
so I really don't know what you are referring to? |
Archives