| 1 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 06:47:30 -0400 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:01 AM, gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that |
| 5 |
> > my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the |
| 6 |
> > * timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry |
| 7 |
> > if this way of syncing my portage tree still works and will |
| 8 |
> > work in the future. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> https://infra-status.gentoo.org/notice/20150808-git |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Update (2015-08-11) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Syncing issues are still being worked on. |
| 16 |
> Some services depending on the package repository are also still |
| 17 |
> pending to be adapted (packages.gentoo.org, snapshots). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> (emerge-webrsync uses the snapshots I believe) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> As far as I'm aware there are no current plans to make emerge-webrsync |
| 22 |
> stop working. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Ok, thank you for the information. |
Archives