1 |
On 12/8/22 05:58, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I was thinking DAS was not a good option. It seems like a feature |
5 |
> removed and cheaper version of NAS. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I think I've seen a couple Synology NAS boxes but I think even used they |
8 |
> were a bit pricey. Still, used could make that a option. Maybe. It |
9 |
> could fall into the category of pay a little more for a much better |
10 |
> option, even if it is used. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I've considered using older systems I have for NAS but they are large. |
13 |
> Way to large. It would require a lot of effort to shrink them down if |
14 |
> it is even possible. A NAS is smaller and designed for what I need as |
15 |
> well. This is what I found that goes with the Raspberry Pi. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> https://shop.allnetchina.cn/collections/sata-hat/products/dual-sata-hat-open-frame-for-raspberry-pi-4 |
18 |
> |
19 |
> There is a two bay and a four bay version. I think the case is the same |
20 |
> for both so I may go with four for future expansion. Price isn't bad |
21 |
> for that part but as you say, Raspberry Pi board is a bit pricey. Thing |
22 |
> is, given the amount of control I'd have over it, it could be a better |
23 |
> option long term. I might add, I think this board is somewhat new. I |
24 |
> meant to include a link to it but forget. It could be that you are not |
25 |
> aware of that, or many other people either. Also, I'd like to buy it |
26 |
> from a more local vendor. I've bought things from China through Ebay |
27 |
> but it has a guarantee and refund option that is fairly good. It's a |
28 |
> option I've had to exercise a time or two. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Part of me wants to buy a used but well featured NAS box. Part of me |
31 |
> thinks a Raspberry would be better and have upgrade options in the |
32 |
> future as well. I'm pretty sure I could have encryption on a Raspberry |
33 |
> NAS as well. I'm not sure if a prebuilt NAS box has encryption or not. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Hope for some good ideas tho. I'd like to avoid buying something that |
36 |
> won't come close to serving even current needs or just plain doesn't work. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Dale |
39 |
> |
40 |
> :-) :-) |
41 |
|
42 |
Dale, |
43 |
|
44 |
DAS is direct attached storage. If your intention is to share the data |
45 |
with multiple devices for backup you will need to keep in mind that you |
46 |
will need a PC to share the data the DAS device is storing. In general, |
47 |
most DAS require some sort of HBA (some of these HBAs can be hundreds to |
48 |
thousands of dollars.) I've seen some eSata ones but they usually don't |
49 |
have stellar reviews. It's also getting harder to find eSata devices. |
50 |
|
51 |
In contrast NAS devices are designed to plug in to the network and be |
52 |
shared with multiple devices on the LAN right from the get-go. |
53 |
|
54 |
You are probably interested in a NAS, not a DAS. |
55 |
|
56 |
I have an aging ix4-300d NAS. The display has started crashing now but |
57 |
the device is still rock solid. However I'm in the same boat and have |
58 |
been researching options - I think for my case I will get a small cube |
59 |
case and mini-ITX board and roll my own Gentoo install. The cost may |
60 |
even be slightly cheaper as 4 bay NAS here are quite expensive where I |
61 |
am (with no drives installed) and building my own will be a bit cheaper |
62 |
and I can choose what drives to run in it. Vulnerabilities on devices |
63 |
like QNAP and Synology are very real and at least if you can roll your |
64 |
own you can keep that to a minimum (like an example not running a web |
65 |
browser to configure things.) |
66 |
|
67 |
Dan |