Archives
Archives
| From: | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo | ||
| Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:08:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5638006.K46TgzrMi4@dell_xps | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo by "Max R.D. Parmer" |
||
| 1 | On Monday 28 Mar 2016 10:54:49 Max R.D. Parmer wrote: |
| 2 | > I think the paper on Intel issues Mick is referring to is the one I |
| 3 | > linked not too long ago: |
| 4 | > http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Yes, here's the M/L thread: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/288720 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > It seems like you're looking for something like the EFF's "surveillance |
| 12 | > self-defense"[1] site but with some stuff specific to Gentoo. |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > [1]: https://ssd.eff.org/ |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Also worth a read, for sysadmins at least is this: |
| 17 | |
| 18 | https://bettercrypto.org/static/applied-crypto-hardening.pdf |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Revisit regularly, as this is WIP and it gets updated every now and then as |
| 21 | more vulnerabilities are discovered. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | Regards, |
| 25 | Mick |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |