1 |
On Sunday 11 September 2005 08:33, Nick Rout wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 23:03 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 10 September 2005 20:09, Frank Schafer wrote: |
4 |
> > > ... or which distribution to install during less than 4 days? |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > Hi list, |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > as I wrote yesterday I planned to complete installation after work |
9 |
> > > (started ``emerge --emptytree system'' in the morning). |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > where did you get the idea that --emptytree is needed or even a wise |
12 |
> > decision? --emptytree is almost NEVER needed and since it is a troublesom |
13 |
> > procedure, it should not be made, until you are totally sure, that you |
14 |
> > need it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I imagine he read the install instructions, which are pretty clear about |
17 |
> doing an |
18 |
> |
19 |
> emerge --emptytree system |
20 |
> |
21 |
> What makes you think this is wrong? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=6#doc_ch |
24 |
>ap2 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> (bottom of the page) |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
WRONG |
30 |
|
31 |
it is there to show you, what emerge system wants to install. there is nothing |
32 |
about doing it! (Check again, see the -p) |
33 |
|
34 |
And in the 2005.1 handbook is no (!) --emptytree. |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |