Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage?
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 06:39:24
Message-Id: 1126420400.11899.23.camel@sf.rout.dyndns.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 23:03 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2 > On Saturday 10 September 2005 20:09, Frank Schafer wrote:
3 > > ... or which distribution to install during less than 4 days?
4 > >
5 > > Hi list,
6 > >
7 > > as I wrote yesterday I planned to complete installation after work
8 > > (started ``emerge --emptytree system'' in the morning).
9 > >
10 >
11 > where did you get the idea that --emptytree is needed or even a wise decision?
12 > --emptytree is almost NEVER needed and since it is a troublesom procedure, it
13 > should not be made, until you are totally sure, that you need it.
14 >
15
16
17 I imagine he read the install instructions, which are pretty clear about
18 doing an
19
20 emerge --emptytree system
21
22 What makes you think this is wrong?
23
24 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=6#doc_chap2
25
26 (bottom of the page)
27
28 > emerge system
29 >
30 > is all you need to do, to get the base system.
31 > After that, emerge what you like to have, but NEVER use --emptytree, except
32 > when you are able to deal with the consequences.
33 >
34 > Obviously you are not, so do not do it.
35 > NO
36 >
37 >
38 > was that clear enough?
39
40
41 >
42 > For your gcc-problem, there is the fix script, others mentioned - but a lot of
43 > times all that is needed is to run gcc-config to set the correct gcc.
44 --
45 Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz>
46
47 --
48 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>