| 1 |
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> The 07/09/12, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> The thing is tho, whether it is using the memory as cache or using it |
| 5 |
>> as |
| 6 |
>> tmpfs, it is the same memory. There is no difference. That's the |
| 7 |
>> whole |
| 8 |
>> point. |
| 9 |
> Feel free to take your own assumptions as undeniable truth. The way the |
| 10 |
> kernel work with memory is the key, of course. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Now, as long as you blind yourself with statements like that, I'm not |
| 13 |
> going to respond anymore. I guess you need to make some basic research. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I understand how the kernel uses memory. That's why it doesn't matter |
| 17 |
if you put portage's work directory on tmpfs or not. I been using Linux |
| 18 |
for a pretty good long while now. I have a pretty good understanding of |
| 19 |
it, especially the things that I use. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Respond or not, I know what I tested and what the results were. They |
| 22 |
were not just my tests and results either. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dale |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
:-) :-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives