1 |
On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:04:12 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I have 3 desktop machines with 32 GB of memory. In all 3 I still have |
4 |
> swap (32 GB, I stopped using the "twice the amount of RAM" rule years |
5 |
> ago). I don't think I have ever used one single byte from the swap; it |
6 |
> always sits with "0 bytes used" when I check top. |
7 |
|
8 |
% free -h |
9 |
total used free shared buff/cache available |
10 |
Mem: 31Gi 3.2Gi 9Gi 5.3Gi 18Gi 22Gi |
11 |
Swap: 8.0Gi 8.0Mi 8.0Gi |
12 |
|
13 |
Something's using a little of it here. |
14 |
|
15 |
> So I don't think you need the swap; I keep using it in case I need to |
16 |
> ever hibernate the machines, bit I never do. Also, it's always on the |
17 |
> mechanical disks, so it's dirty cheap. |
18 |
|
19 |
As you say, it's cheap and you're hardly going to noting a few GB out of |
20 |
a multi-TB disk. |
21 |
|
22 |
The question was about *needing* swap, to which the answer is generally |
23 |
no. But the more important question is whether you are better off with or |
24 |
without it, which is a much more complex problem, although I see no good |
25 |
reason to not have it and reasonable reasons to leave it there. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Neil Bothwick |
30 |
|
31 |
WORM: (n.) acronym for Write Once, Read Mangled. Used to describe a |
32 |
normally-functioning computer disk of the very latest design. |