| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:33 on Tuesday 05 October 2010, dhk did |
| 2 |
opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 10/05/2010 05:28 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 10:25 on Tuesday 05 October 2010, dhk did |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > opine thusly: |
| 8 |
> >> What should I do about dev-util/autotoolset? I use it every day for a |
| 9 |
> >> project, but today it looks like I'm being told to remove it. What is |
| 10 |
> >> the alternative? |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> In my package.keywords file I have "dev-util/autotoolset ~amd64" |
| 13 |
> >> unmasked since I use autotools for a project. |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> After the output of "emerge -uDNp world" this morning the following |
| 16 |
> >> message is displayed. |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> >> !!! The following installed packages are masked: |
| 19 |
> >> - dev-util/autotoolset-0.11.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask) |
| 20 |
> >> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
| 21 |
> >> # Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> (04 Oct 2010) |
| 22 |
> >> # on behalf of QA team |
| 23 |
> >> # |
| 24 |
> >> # Ironically, it is misusing autotools (bug #255831). It was |
| 25 |
> >> # added in 2004 and never version bumped since; autotools |
| 26 |
> >> # have since evolved a fair amount, while this is based |
| 27 |
> >> # still on automake 1.6. Avoid keeping it around. |
| 28 |
> >> # |
| 29 |
> >> # Removal on 2010-12-03 |
| 30 |
> >> |
| 31 |
> >> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge |
| 32 |
> >> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 33 |
> >> |
| 34 |
> >> As stated above, what should I "Avoid keeping it around?" Is it |
| 35 |
> >> autotoolset, automake 1.6, ...? Also, what's getting removed on |
| 36 |
> >> 2010-12-03? If autotoolset is removed, what should be used to build |
| 37 |
> >> projects? |
| 38 |
> > |
| 39 |
> > The text applies to autotoolset and the reason it is being removed. It is |
| 40 |
> > autotoolset that is not being kept around anymore. |
| 41 |
> > |
| 42 |
> > It's actually quite obvious once you calm down, get over your fright, and |
| 43 |
> > read the message. |
| 44 |
> > |
| 45 |
> > You do not need autotoolset to build projects. You need autotools which |
| 46 |
> > is not the same thing. |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> >> Even though I have autotoolset installed, search shows it as being |
| 49 |
> >> masked. |
| 50 |
> >> |
| 51 |
> >> # emerge --search autotoolset |
| 52 |
> >> Searching... |
| 53 |
> >> [ Results for search key : autotoolset ] |
| 54 |
> >> [ Applications found : 1 ] |
| 55 |
> >> |
| 56 |
> >> * dev-util/autotoolset [ Masked ] |
| 57 |
> >> |
| 58 |
> >> Latest version available: 0.11.4-r1 |
| 59 |
> >> Latest version installed: 0.11.4-r1 |
| 60 |
> >> Size of files: 1,133 kB |
| 61 |
> >> Homepage: http://autotoolset.sourceforge.net/ |
| 62 |
> >> Description: colection of small tools to simplify project |
| 63 |
> >> |
| 64 |
> >> development with autotools |
| 65 |
> >> |
| 66 |
> >> License: GPL-2 |
| 67 |
> >> |
| 68 |
> >> What to do now? |
| 69 |
> > |
| 70 |
> > Why are you worried? You use autotools not autotoolset. Let the thing be |
| 71 |
> > removed, After 6 years of no updates you shouldn't be using it anyway. |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> So are you saying if I remove autotoolset that I'll still have autoconf, |
| 74 |
> automake, and the rest; and everything will work the same? I thought |
| 75 |
> all the autotools were in autotoolset. I guess I don't know the |
| 76 |
> difference between autotools and autotoolset and what they are made up of. |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
autotools != autotoolset |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
The description from eix that you yourself posted tells you as much. |
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
Run "equery files autotoolset" and see what is in the package. Decide for |
| 84 |
yourself if you want to keep it and if so move the ebuild to your local |
| 85 |
overlay where you can maintain it for yourself. |
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-- |
| 88 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives