1 |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:19:55PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> urpion@×××.com wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Michael wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Friday, 19 June 2020 16:35:27 BST urpion@×××.com wrote: |
5 |
> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:45:59AM -0500, Dale wrote: |
6 |
> >>>> Jack wrote: |
7 |
> >>>>> Not far enough back. You need to show the actual error, not the line |
8 |
> >>>>> "Error1:" which gets printed after the error. |
9 |
> >>>> And depending on the number of cores/threads and other emerge settings, |
10 |
> >>>> it can be a dozen, two dozen lines or sometimes even further back than |
11 |
> >>>> that. With CPUs having a dozen or so cores/threads, it's amazing that |
12 |
> >>>> some stuff compiles at all. Prime example, recent thread about Pam |
13 |
> >>>> updates. |
14 |
> >>>> |
15 |
> >>>> OP, if needed, tar the whole error log and attach it. Just don't post |
16 |
> >>>> it elsewhere and link to it tho. After a while, it's gone or a person |
17 |
> >>>> finds the log but not this thread with the solution. |
18 |
> >>>> |
19 |
> >>>> Dale |
20 |
> >>>> |
21 |
> >>>> :-) :-) |
22 |
> >>> Ah ha. Yes Thank you. Sorry, I've never been good with e-mail:-P |
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >> NP, did you get an OOM error in dmesg when this happened by any chance? You |
25 |
> >> don't seem to have much RAM, you have no swap and the number of jobs is |
26 |
> >> relatively high for memory hungry compiles. |
27 |
> >> |
28 |
> >> It could be a bug, but unless a report has been filed already in BGO to this |
29 |
> >> effect, I suggest you add a swapfile, enable it, and try again with |
30 |
> >> MAKEOPTS="-j1" or "-j2". Please ask if you need more detail. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > I was thinking about -j1. I tried -j4. I thought I didn't need swap with >=4GB |
33 |
> > of RAM, but it makes sense. My machine kinda crawls trying to build that |
34 |
> > package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Create a swap file. I'm not sure about the speed compared to a swap |
40 |
> partition but if you have room somewhere, no need to repartition. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> I might add, 4GBs is not much nowadays. When I had 16GBs before my |
43 |
> upgrade to 32GBs, I'd sometimes run out of memory. Of course, I have |
44 |
> portage's work directory on tmpfs but the bigger stuff was on hard |
45 |
> drives still. Some packages need a lot of memory. Even with 32GBs, I |
46 |
> still have some compile on hard drive and it uses a lot of memory just |
47 |
> for the processes themselves. The more jobs, the more it uses. I still |
48 |
> have a large swap partition even with 32GBs. If LOo, Firefox and a |
49 |
> couple others hit at the same time, it uses swap at times. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Just something to think on. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Dale |
54 |
> |
55 |
> :-) :-) |
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
Yep. I'm thinkin on that. Thank you |